Chevrolet Captiva 2.4 LPG (gas), road test (Part III)

Diego G. Moreira     7 November 2009     5 min.
Chevrolet Captiva 2.4 LPG (gas), road test (Part III)

Chevrolet_captiva_GLP

Now that we have seen how the Chevrolet Captiva 2.4 LPG gas version performs with its 136 CV engine and we have reviewed its interior space and design details, we still need to talk about its equipment, price and overall assessment of the model.

One of the advantages of the LPG Captiva is its price: the LPG Captiva in base LS trim is on sale from 21,400 euros, that is, 2,500 euros more expensive than the base Captiva in LS trim with the 2.4 petrol engine of 136 CV (which has a promotion). Without a doubt it is worth opting for the LPG range rather than buying the petrol version only, since the fuel saving is very significant and we can get a Captiva at a fairly tight price, and also depending on the autonomous community there are grants of up to 2,000 euros for being a gas-powered vehicle.

By comparison, the cheapest diesel version, the 2.0 VCDi 127 CV, called LS7, which has seven seats and somewhat more complete equipment, comes to 23,990 euros (promotion included). But this LS7 version is much more sensible in terms of equipment, adding elements such as stability control, front fog lights, cruise control, traction control and rollover control, among other features that the LPG Captiva does not have.

Equipment

Captiva_EuroNCAPç

In terms of safety the LPG Captiva comes quite well equipped with elements such as ABS brakes with EBD, front and front side airbags, and even curtain airbags. But it has important gaps such as stability control, traction control and rollover control. Even so, in the EuroNCAP test the Captiva has proved to be a fairly safe car and has achieved four stars; basically it scored lower in the frontal impact for not having a knee airbag, while in the side impact it obtained the maximum score.

Leaving aside safety equipment, the differences between the base LS version and the diesel LS7 version in the rest of areas are minimal. Both have a CD radio with MP3 that works very well, air conditioning, electric mirrors, electric windows, central locking, etc. Only the fog lights and the rear parking sensor are missing.

As I mentioned at the beginning, the LS trim does without the on-board computer screen, which shows the data of the single-zone air conditioner (dispensable since the air conditioning works very well), as well as the car’s consumption data, outside temperature, and even a compass. So it is a dispensable extra, and the glovebox that takes its place is very practical.

Overall assessment

Chevrolet_captiva_GLP

This is perhaps the most important section of the whole test, because many of you will wonder whether it is worth buying a gas car or one with these equipment gaps. The first thing I have been seeing since I got the car in my hands is that it could have had a bit more equipment, that is, the same as the LS7 version, which includes important safety elements, leaving the LS only for the petrol engine.

In fact, our unit came with somewhat more complete equipment (remember it was an Italian version), close to the LS7 version, with safety elements such as traction control or stability control. But since in Spain it is only associated with the base trim level, we have to go to price as its point in favour.

If we want a Captiva at a low price with an interesting engine that responds without complications and, despite its power, is more than enough to move the Captiva with ease, and we do not want to spend too much on fuel (the 2.4 petrol Captiva consumes on average 8.9 l/100 km), then we can go for the LPG version, which will greatly cut the fuel bill (autogas is also used by some taxi drivers).

Chevrolet_captiva_GLP

The Captiva is also a spacious car with enough room for five occupants, in which we can travel comfortably, and if we combine this with the low price of gas, we can cover quite a few kilometres without hurting the wallet. Even for urban journeys it will be a cheaper car than the petrol-only engine. But on the other hand, if we want a somewhat better-equipped car and price is no object (which may amount to between 2,000 and 4,000 euros more if we count the regional grants), we can go for the diesel Captiva LS7 at 23,990 euros (promotion included).

Therefore, overall the assessment is positive, highlighting the equipment gaps, and also, as the brand itself has told us, petrol models already registered can be converted to autogas, provided they are no more than two years old. In addition, installers such as Ferrosite adapt models of other brands to LPG, provided they are petrol.

Finally, we need to talk about the LPG supply. Currently in Spain there are around 36 petrol stations that supply LPG (at least Repsol’s), and by the end of 2009 another 20 points are planned. Therefore it is a fuel that is experiencing a significant boost, and in the medium term the network will keep growing.

Chevrolet_captiva_GLP

Versions

  • Captiva LS 2.4 136 CV 19,900 euros
  • Captiva GLP LS 2.4 136 CV 21,400 euros
  • Captiva LS7 2.0 VCDI 127 CV 23,990 euros
  • Captiva LS7+ 2.0 VCDI 24,890 euros
  • Captiva LT 2.0 VCDI 150 CV 29,500 euros
  • Captiva LTX 2.0 VCDi 150 CV 32,250 euros
  • Captiva LTX 3.2 V6 230 CV aut 34,250 euros

Photos | Diego G. Moreira


2 comentarios

  1. La diferencia de precio no es mucha entre la versión a gas y diésel. A pesar de que el gas es un combustible muy limpio (y muy barato), hay que ver cuánto kilometraje rinde a gas y si el consumo vale la pena.

    Preferiría la versión diésel seguramente con mucha más autonomía y más torque.

  2. La autonomía es mayor con el modelo GLP, porque cuenta con dos depósitos y podemos estar hablando tranquilamente de unos 200-300 km más de autonomía con el modelo de gas.

    Y en cuanto al precio la diferencia es pequeña, si contamos ayudas puede llegar a unos 4.000 euros, pero también es cierto que hablamos de precios promocionales de la versión diesel, que está más completa en equipamiento.

    Yo la pega que le veo es el equipamiento, del resto el gas me ha gustado porque es muy ecnonómico.

Deja un comentario