New Pegasus helicopters: how does their radar work, which roads do they fly over and how much do they cost us?
For a year now, traffic offenders have had a relentless enemy that is hard to escape. It is the Pegasus, an airborne radar mounted on a helicopter that flies over Spain’s roads in search of drivers who break traffic rules, and who now find it much harder to avoid being located and fined.
But what do we really know about the Pegasus? Are you sure you know which areas it flies over, the type of roads its work focuses on and, above all, the cost of each of the Pegasus units that fly over our country? We are going to try to clear up those doubts.
The Pegasus radar consists of two high-precision cameras and software that processes the images and converts them into the data needed to take the measurements. The first camera captures a panoramic image of the road and detects vehicles that may be exceeding the maximum speed. The second camera is able to provide more detail, capturing the licence plate number and thus identifying the specific car so that a fine can be issued.
The system was developed by the Canadian company Wescam and a team of Spanish designers, and it is optimised to operate at around 300 metres of altitude above the road. The maximum distance for taking effective measurements is one kilometre between the helicopter and the car. When it locates a vehicle that may be committing an offence, it takes three speed measurements.
These, as with fixed radars, have a margin of error of 4%. To put that in perspective, the error rises to 7% in the case of mobile radars, but the Pegasus maintains a reduced and fairly reliable figure. In addition to speed, the efficient detail camera can capture an image of the driver, showing whether they are paying attention to the road or, for example, talking on the phone. At least, that is what the DGT tells us.
The Pegasus usually flies over secondary roads, where many of the fatal accidents on the State Road Network occur. On two-way roads 78% of accidents are recorded, which is why the Pegasus has been assigned to them.
This radar costs about the same as fixed radars, although no exact figures have been given. It is estimated to cost between 60,000 and 170,000 euros per unit, and the only one that operated last year was mounted on a Eurocopter EC-135. It logged 428 flight hours in 2013 and tracked 8,500 vehicles.
Of these, 1,441 drivers were fined for travelling on average 30 km/h above the speed limit of the road. These offences led to the loss of 1,280 points from the driving licences of those penalised, in addition to the payment of the fines.
This year up to five more units will go into service, meaning six helicopters equipped with Pegasus, which will increase control over these roads. But is the use of these aerial speed control systems economically profitable?

Taking into account the cost of each radar, which we have already seen could be between 60,000 and 170,000 euros, it must be borne in mind that each helicopter can only fly for about two hours on a full tank on average. Each flight hour can cost around 1,500 euros, including fuel and crew.
Is that too high a cost for monitoring the cars travelling on Spanish roads? It could be, but the results obtained suggest that it may be self-financing, however unpleasant it may be for drivers who fall under its cameras committing an offence.
If it manages to save the life of a driver, by making them moderate their speed and take extra precautions when driving, it may well be worth having them flying over our heads. But, as always happens with the issue of radars and speed control on the road, the line separating what is useful from what is merely a revenue-raising measure is very thin and delicate.
Source | DGT – In-house production
3 comentarios
Deja un comentario


Kia offers an electric range of 10 models, 50 versions and 400 possible combinations
The seven finalists for the 2027 European Car of the Year (COTY) are exclusively electric
Peugeot E-208 GTi: a battery-powered toy that revives the spirit of the 1980s sports cars
Muy sencillo:
428 horas de vuelo a 1.500€ = 642.000 € a lo que sumar el coste del equipamiento.
Para autofinanciarse con las 1.441 sanciones estas serían de media de 445€. Teniendo en cuenta que se pagan con el 40% de descuento, eso supone que la sanción debería alcanzar de media los 800€, Las multas de 800€ acarrean 6 puntos, que multiplicado por el número de sanciones (1.441) alcanzaría 8.646, muy lejos de los 1.280 puntos que acarrearon.
No parece que salgan los números muy rentables. La menor retirada de puntos por exceso de velocidad es de 2. Así que para retirar 1.280 puntos, deducimos que ni siquiera la mitad de sancionados excedían tanto el límite como para acarrear retirada de puntos. Eso también indica que el riesgo que supone su infracción es cuestionable técnicamente.
¿salvar una vida? Sería la primera vez que un radar lo consigue. Seamos serios, las vidas las salva el sentido común, la atención de los conductores y su pericia, algo contra lo que no parece que se luche desde la DGT. No se incentiva a la gente a mejorar sus aptitudes al volante, no se plantean iniciativas con las aseguradoras para que los conductores asistan a cursos de conducción segura. Uno aprende mucho en esos cursos, sobre todo se aprende que no somos pilotos expertos y que los coches son muy difíciles de manejar en condiciones extremas. Te enseñan a frenar, que puede parecer una tontería, pero los datos son muy esclarecedores, el 60% de accidentes se podrían evitar si la gente frenase correctamente. Te enseñan a coger el volante y sentarte para poder tener la mayor capacidad de reacción en caso de enfrentarse a una situación comprometida. Sobre todo te enfrentan a ese tipo de situaciones para que aprendas a solucionarlas o a no agravarlas más. Normalmente la gente se enfrenta a ellas por primera vez en la carretera y no tiene otra oportunidad.
Con 620.000 € podemos pagar más de 1.000 cursos de ese tipo… y seguro que salvaría más vidas que el helicóptero que en la mayoría de los casos no impide que el conductor cometa la infracción ya que no se percata de su presencia.
Alex,
Yo también opino lo mismo con el tema de los cursos, que es mucho más efectivo y educativo, pero creo que no es competencia de la DGT, sino del propio conductor.
De hecho, en los últimos años estamos viendo mayor interés por nuestra parte (los conductores) y por las marcas de coches de aprender de esta manera, a conducir y evitar accidentes, no a circular y respetar las normas de circulación.
Estoy convencido que lo conseguiremos entre todos, es cuestión de tiempo.
Me da mucha pena q todo sea por dinero y no por ayudar al ciudadano
q pena